Peer Review Policy

但是，我们了解到某些手稿可能会出现较小的错误，不会显着影响研究质量。在这种情况下，我们没有直接拒绝论文，而是为作者提供了根据审稿人的特定反馈来修改其工作的机会。必须在给定的时间范围内重新提交修订的手稿。一旦重新提交，本文将进行另一轮评估，以验证所有建议的更改均已正确实施。如果审阅者和编辑发现问题已经令人满意地解决，则该文章将被接受供出版。
我们的审查过程旨在维持高学术标准，同时对作者也很公平。我们鼓励我们的审稿人提出建设性的批评，并在必要时有多种机会来完善他们的工作。根据已确定的错误的性质和严重性，可以根据需要重复多次重复重复次数。这种方法使我们能够过滤薄弱的研究，同时还可以帮助作者改善工作，并为科学界做出宝贵的发现。

此外，我们的审稿人是根据他们在各自研究领域的专业知识和经验选择的。期望他们遵循道德准则，并确保其判断纯粹基于论文的科学质量。我们强烈劝阻偏见，不公平或不专业的评论。任何发现违反这些道德标准的审阅者都可以从审查小组中删除。
为了确保透明度，如果作者认为自己的手稿受到不公平的拒绝，也可以提起社论决定。此类上诉将由高级编辑会员审查，如果认为有效，该论文将被重新评估。
通过遵循这一严格的同伴审查过程，我们确保我们的杂志在分子科学领域发表可信，有影响力和高质量研究的声誉。

The manuscripts being received for publication shall be subjected to a double-blind review process, meaning that both the author and the reviewer remain anonymous to each other. This ensures an unbiased and fair evaluation of the research work. The review process includes detecting misconduct, fake academic contributions, false outcomes, data fabrication, and plagiarism to maintain the authenticity and credibility of published research. Our primary aim is to ensure that only high-quality and original research makes its way into the scientific world.

Journal of Molecular Science follows a structured and transparent review system. We have a well-defined set of rules and procedures that our reviewers and editorial board members must adhere to while evaluating submitted manuscripts. This ensures consistency in the review process and upholds ethical publishing standards. Every submission is thoroughly checked, and if a paper is found to be misleading, copied, or unsuitable for publication, it will be rejected immediately. The editorial board has the final say in such decisions after considering all aspects of the research and the feedback provided by the reviewers.

However, we understand that some manuscripts may have minor errors that do not significantly impact the quality of research. In such cases, rather than rejecting the paper outright, we provide authors with an opportunity to revise their work based on specific feedback from the reviewers. The revised manuscript must be re-submitted within the given timeframe. Once resubmitted, the paper will undergo another round of evaluation to verify that all suggested changes have been properly implemented. If the reviewers and editors find that the issues have been satisfactorily addressed, the article will be accepted for publication.

Our review process is designed to maintain high academic standards while also being fair to authors. We encourage constructive criticism from our reviewers, and authors are given multiple chances to refine their work if necessary. The resubmission and re-reviewing process can be repeated as many times as needed, depending on the nature and severity of the identified errors. This approach allows us to filter out weak research while also helping authors improve their work and contribute valuable findings to the scientific community.

Furthermore, our reviewers are selected based on their expertise and experience in the respective field of research. They are expected to follow ethical guidelines and ensure that their judgments are purely based on the scientific quality of the paper. We strongly discourage biased, unfair, or unprofessional reviews. Any reviewer found violating these ethical standards may be removed from the review panel.

To ensure transparency, authors can also appeal editorial decisions if they believe their manuscript was unfairly rejected. Such appeals will be reviewed by senior editorial members, and if deemed valid, the paper will be re-evaluated.

By following this rigorous peer review process, we ensure that our journal maintains its reputation for publishing credible, impactful, and high-quality research in the field of molecular sciences.